<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Administrative or Professional: that is the question</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pseudohr.com/2009/10/24/administrative-or-professional-that-is-the-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pseudohr.com/2009/10/24/administrative-or-professional-that-is-the-question/</link>
	<description>Because HR can fake it too</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 01:45:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SHRM_PHR_SPHR</title>
		<link>http://www.pseudohr.com/2009/10/24/administrative-or-professional-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-896</link>
		<dc:creator>SHRM_PHR_SPHR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pseudohr.com/?p=382#comment-896</guid>
		<description>This is really interesting and something I&#039;m sure could be discussed back and forth.

Based on the SHRM Learning System description as well as the Department of Labor&#039;s description, it seems that HR would typically fall under an administrative exemption because neither certification nor a particular type of academic degree is required for entry into the HR field.

However, I think you make a great case for it being a learned professional exemption based on the fact that certification and advanced training is so important. 

FLSA exemptions are covered in Module 4 of the SHRM Learning System. Definitely a great resource for discussion like this.
http://www.shrm.org/Education/educationalproducts/learning/Pages/default.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting and something I&#8217;m sure could be discussed back and forth.</p>
<p>Based on the SHRM Learning System description as well as the Department of Labor&#8217;s description, it seems that HR would typically fall under an administrative exemption because neither certification nor a particular type of academic degree is required for entry into the HR field.</p>
<p>However, I think you make a great case for it being a learned professional exemption based on the fact that certification and advanced training is so important. </p>
<p>FLSA exemptions are covered in Module 4 of the SHRM Learning System. Definitely a great resource for discussion like this.<br />
<a href="http://www.shrm.org/Education/educationalproducts/learning/Pages/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.shrm.org/Education/educationalproducts/learning/Pages/default.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Administrative or Professional: that is the question — PseudoHR -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.pseudohr.com/2009/10/24/administrative-or-professional-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Administrative or Professional: that is the question — PseudoHR -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pseudohr.com/?p=382#comment-861</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Barbara Ling and Victorio Milian, adowling. adowling said: New post! Administrative or Professional: that is the question: It’s Saturday, that means SPHR study g.. http://bit.ly/Jrn3F [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Barbara Ling and Victorio Milian, adowling. adowling said: New post! Administrative or Professional: that is the question: It’s Saturday, that means SPHR study g.. <a href="http://bit.ly/Jrn3F" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Jrn3F</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

